Among hundreds of sites, I requested Ning to be unblocked for TAFE users here in NSW. I’d forgotten about it - written off as another victim of the ether. But then yesterday I received this reply….
Colleague
You have requested access to www.ning.com or a social networking group established at this site. Currently the DET matrix does not allow social networking for any users. I have undertaken to structure a review committee for the filtering policy but this group is yet to be fully formulated and that process of any review may take some time.
It is my solely personal view that a more satisfactory answer to this matter is for intranet hosting space to be made available for these purposes. This would leave the contents accountable within the DET infrastructure and would obviate the need for filtering to be involved.
In order to progress this matter I have determined to allow social networking sites constructed on the ning platform under the following criteria.
Criteria
1. The network should be accessed by invitation only
2. The network should be private
3. The network posting should be moderated
4. The network should carry an acceptable usage statement.
In order to allow any network please forward to me screenshots of your settings to indicate the matching of these criteria.
I invite you to visit www.otenvaluation.ning.com as a sample allowed social network. It also carries the TAFE logo to identify its bona fides. You may wish to contact XXX at OTEN for an agreed sample of an acceptable usage statement to adopt or modify to suit.

[image: base2wave]
My response:
Hi XXX
Re your email about Ning…..
Thank you for responding.
I look forward to some positive outcomes and genuine consultation with the next web filtering committee.
You no doubt are aware that Agnes and I spent long hours working on the first iteration without any satisfactory outcome.
A few comments if I may ….
Re “a more satisfactory answer to this matter is for intranet hosting space to be made available for these purposes”
Unfortunately this is not the solution. There is a much larger world out there. Teachers do not want to solely communicate with people in DET. There is a wealth of skill, talent, knowledge, willingness to share internationally that TAFE is/will miss out on unless it moves beyond a lock down policy.
The aim of these sites to allow professionals and courses to connect globally AND to also enable access and upload/sharing outside DET – eg at work, at home. If we are serious about the sentiments outlined in the 21st century paper then have to start looking at TAFE services extending far beyond the reaches of the intranet.
Employers will not waste time registering with multiple spaces to support learners. The benefits of an open policy are far greater than any perceived risks. Certainly we need some teachers agreed guidelines on usage with learners/clients but let’s engage with teachers around this, not set imposed restrictions and inappropriate rules.
Re privacy….
While there are some occasions in which a totally private site is needed (use of SharePoint or the TAFE websites are suggested where private student data/info is required) there are also many more times when teachers want to connect courses and classes and themselves beyond DET.
Really it is unlikely that anyone other than those interested in specialised network topics would go to or use a particular space anyway. Most require invitations to add content – that is the key rather than access to the site
See for example http://library20.ning.com/
Interestingly it was Ning that provided content for xxx’s presentation to India this year.
Had it not been for the generous spirit of Simon Brown’s network in TAFE QLD we would not have had the rich resource we did. One of the winners of the 2007 Edublog awards also uses Ning – see http://www.classroom20.com/ and as a result have gained international standing.
There are numerous examples of universities placing content on the open web. It’s the quality of teaching that wins clients not content. I understand TAFE wanting to own spaces and to control intellectual property, but it’s a losing battle in a day and age of globally networked communities and professional educators. If you make it too hard teachers for teachers to do their job they will simply go their own way and do their own thing. Support them and their need to connect and communicate outside DET and at least you have some idea what is happening.
A simple template could be possible but it would need to be very user friendly and adaptable.
Have you investigated the great work done with wikispaces by Sydney Institute? They are public and very widely used with great uptake. Teachers and students can access anywhere anytime. This is the way TAFE is heading on the ground. This is what teachers are demanding.
I know it’s a challenge, but TAFE is going to have to bite the bullet and accept that teachers demand a suite of tools of differing levels of style, accessibility and functionality, to be globally networked and to access what they want when they need it.
Ning is just one of 100s of sites, tools, spaces used by teachers today. They are being created every day – more refined, more responsive to teachers needs, more connected globally. TAFE needs to be part of the global network, rather than fight against it.
Let’s provide the opportunity for teachers to evaluate spaces, and for learners to learn how to use them and navigate online safely.
I’m so tired of this. I feel like a broken record. Roll on Christmas.